Screening · scoping · environmental baseline

From project boundary to a baseline you can investigate further.

Accelerate screening, scoping and the evidence base with multi-theme data for the same boundary, historical comparisons and editable reports.

Browser-based access · nothing to install

Territorial brief01 / 03

Today the work starts here

  • Environmental components gathered from inconsistent sources and periods
  • Extensive preliminary work before impact interpretation can begin
  • Maps and tables rebuilt for reports, alternatives and stakeholders
XN Maps
Mapssame boundary
Comparisonsyears and indicators
Reportready to share
Scopingacross multiple components
Baselinespatial and temporal
Evidence packto verify and integrate

Practical use cases

Not “make a map”. Complete a job.

Each case starts with a professional question, shows how XN Maps supports the workflow and states what you can deliver.

01

Screening and scoping environmental components

The job question

Rapidly identify which topics may be relevant to the project and where to focus official data, field surveys and specialist input.

How you address it

Query available biodiversity, land-use, water, risk, climate, pressure and socioeconomic indicators for the same boundary.

What you deliver

  • Topic-area matrix
  • Pre-screening maps
  • Specialist briefs
02

Multi-theme territorial baseline

The job question

Build a coherent initial picture for components such as biodiversity, land use, soil, water, air and climate, recognising that they do not all come from the same dataset.

How you address it

Generate the relevant layers, retain the period, unit and legend for each, and select those to validate against primary sources.

What you deliver

  • Thematic atlas
  • KPIs and statistics
  • Regional climate context
03

Historical evolution of the area

The job question

Distinguish the current state from changes already under way before discussing the project's potential effects.

How you address it

Compare imagery and indicators from 2017 onwards for vegetation, water, moisture, surface temperature, urbanisation and night-time light.

What you deliver

  • Before-and-after series
  • Delta layers
  • Evidence for trend description
04

Context for site alternatives

The job question

Apply a consistent evidence base to multiple options without confusing preliminary screening with a complete comparative assessment.

How you address it

Repeat the same indicator set across alternative boundaries and use the outputs to surface issues requiring specialist comparison.

What you deliver

  • Consistent map pack
  • Checklist for each alternative
  • Input to multi-criteria assessment
05

Monitoring plan and change over time

The job question

Make part of the territorial observation repeatable before, during and after the intervention without attributing causality to satellite data alone.

How you address it

Save the boundary, repeat periods and indicators, and build visual comparisons to combine with project indicators and field surveys.

What you deliver

  • Repeatable baseline
  • Periodic comparisons
  • Monitoring boards
06

Reporting and stakeholder consultation

The job question

Turn extensive technical evidence into a readable document while keeping limitations, sources and professional responsibilities clear.

How you address it

Bring maps, legends and statistics into editable reports and use shareable links for discussion across the project team.

What you deliver

  • HTML/PDF/DOCX draft
  • Cartographic appendices
  • Consultation link

From brief to deliverable

A workflow that fits your work.

  1. 01

    Define and scope

    Start from the project area and select the potentially relevant components.

  2. 02

    Verify and integrate

    Check coverage, scale and period; integrate official data, field surveys and specialist contributions.

  3. 03

    Document

    Bring maps and comparisons into the report under the EIA team's responsibility.

XN Maps in your process

Three modules. Distinct roles.

Use them separately or as one path: climate context, local analysis and change over time.

01

Local analysis · multi-layer

Map Generator

From project boundary to maps, KPIs and an environmental dossier in one workflow.

  • 130+available analyses
  • 11active categories
  • 2017–presenttime series
Discover the module
02

Change · time and indicators

Satellite Comparison

Turn the before, the after and the delta into a story people can understand.

  • 8base indicators
  • 4coordinated views
  • 2–6comparison items
Discover the module
03

Climate · administrative scale

Macro Map Generator

From climate baseline to an operational map for large territories.

  • 1961–90climate baseline
  • 2023–25recent period
  • 100 mdefault resolution
Discover the module

Verifiable context

EIA requires breadth. Professionals build the depth.

The EIA Directive considers direct and indirect effects on population and health, biodiversity, land, soil, water, air, climate, landscape, assets and cultural heritage. The suite helps explore part of this geospatial picture, but it neither predicts impacts nor produces the assessment.

Clear responsibilities

XN Maps accelerates the analysis. Your expertise remains essential.

XN Maps supports screening, knowledge-building and communication. It does not replace official sources, surveys, specialist checks or professional responsibility.

FAQ

Before bringing it into your process.

What you need to know before starting the analysis.

01Does XN Maps produce an EIA?

No. XN Maps does not produce an EIA: it supports screening, scoping, baseline work and cartographic documentation. Impact assessment, alternatives, mitigation, monitoring and procedural compliance remain the responsibility of the developer and appointed professionals.

02Can I use the layers as official data?

It depends on the source, coverage, scale, date and procedural requirements. Every item of evidence must be checked against its primary source and documented in the report methodology.

03Does the satellite comparison prove the project's effect?

No. It shows spatial or temporal differences. Attributing causes requires a monitoring design, suitable indicators, controls and specialist interpretation.

04Can it help compare alternatives?

It can make the initial map set consistent across different boundaries. It does not replace alternatives assessment, criteria weighting or impact analysis.

Start with a real case

Put XN Maps to work on your territory.

Start independently on iLoveNatura or talk to the team about the most suitable workflow.